Monthly Archives: December 2016

Mark Morris (YGtCTO #93)

The Hard Nut

Ballet choreographed by Mark Morris
Set to The Nutcracker composed by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky

Dance is the one art form that you will have the most trouble persuading me to go see. At least, that’s what I think inside my head. And I am entirely wrong. I have little patience for Dancing With the Stars, but that is as much the format as anything. The fact that the main exposure we, as a society, have to ballet is an annual performance of The Nutcracker probably does not help. I don’t watch anything on an annual basis anymore.

But, I think the Nicholas Brothers are among the greatest artists ever produced anywhere anytime. I can sit and watch anything with Gene Kelly or Fred Astaire attached. I can watch Bollywood and 60’s American movies if music and dancing is promised. James Brown, Michael Jackson, and the Temptations are wonders to behold when they move.

So, really, maybe I would go to a dance concert if you showed me something interesting. Which is exactly what happened when someone else turned on the television and insisted on watching The Hard Nut back when it was first broadcast in the early 90’s. It was not an easy sell, but, honestly, you have to see this at least once in your life. Before you do, maybe go to one of those performances of The Nutcracker if you can’t quite remember what those are all about.

Mark Morris The Hard Nut

Then,
we return to The Hard Nut. Look, if you are into dance, then Morris may be old news, but I still find him provoking and interesting. Look at those jumps in his Waltz of the Snowflakes. Those are not the bodies that you usually see in The Nutcracker (nowhere close if you’re paying attention). The whole stage is used in a way that feels as much Busby Berkeley as George Balanchine.

Ultimately, I think The Hard Nut is a bit of a young artist’s game. Why would you do new choreography when people are paying good money to see the same old same old? Your chance of blowing it is pretty high. We grow comfortable as we grow a paunch and turn gray- it becomes less likely that we will take that chance. Or, if you take a chance past your youth, then you have to cast aside your true followers or you’ve merely lost your mind.

Choreography seems like the hardest of the arts, particularly if you are talking about large companies. The precision that you demand of so many human bodies as well as the limitations imposed by that canvas boggles my mind. While we find precision movement in a marching band or a chorus line exhilarating, that is not the same as originality. Stunning craft moves us, but it may not change us the same way that a new approach can. Imbuing dance with wit and social commentary feels harder than anywhere else. Anyone who manages to make a statement against such long odds will never stop making us pause, sit down, and watch.

What’s it all about?

You’ve Got to Check This Out is a blog series about music, words, and all sorts of artistic matters. It started with an explanation. 207 more to go.

New additions to You’ve Got to Check This Out release regularly. Also, free humor, short works, and poetry post irregularly. Receive notifications on Facebook by friending or following Craig.

Images may be subject to copyright.

Tim Cahill (YGtCTO Words #31)

A Wolverine Is Eating My Leg

Book written by Tim Cahill

If there is any writer out there whose career I would have liked to have had, then Tim Cahill would be that person. I discovered him through his travel writing in the late 80s, when he had two collections published: A Wolverine Is Eating My Leg and Jaguars Ripped My Flesh: Adventure is a Risky Business. Outside magazine had been publishing for some time by then and a lot of the pieces in those collections originated there. Up until then, I thought the best way to document travel was with a camera. People did not read National Geographic magazine, did they? They skimmed the pictures, right? Outside offered a slew of writers who changed my assumptions before the current boom in expensive travel (or just dressing in travel gear for your walk around the city).

As it so happens, I may have previously read articles by Tim Cahill when he wrote for Rolling Stone. Since then, maybe when he wrote for Slate. Of course, he stays busy.

I really do not spend enough time writing. Or seeking adventure.

Tim Cahill

Like Lester Bangs,

Cahill places himself in the reportage. He does not bury his reactions in the text. Most newspaper stores were (and remain) bland. Even today when we talk about how partisan and infotainment our news is, the facts are often pretty straightforward. Certainly, we can go philosophical and talk about how the news was always a limited medium (only so many pages or minutes- or advertising to fund the news) which meant that we were receiving the editors’ opinion of what we wanted to know. Or we could go historical and talk about how the newsstand has always made room for the noisiest tabloid (and the sports pages at most papers made room for purple prose once upon a time). Bangs and Cahill read those and the op-ed pieces and the columnists and (with a host of others) helped birth new journalism.

Maybe I like it because the art is showing. We hold journalists in higher esteem for their craft than their art. That impending deadline never stops demanding words. Magazines supposedly offer the luxury of time, but the stories still need to be delivered some time or they expire.

The other thing that gets lost when we talk about journalism as art is that it relies on our most basic form of communication, while we think of art as some sort of elevated communication, centered more at our heart than our brain. After all, everyone uses words. How hard can it be to do a little reporting? I think the profusion of online lists masquerading as journalism makes it clear that actual journalism is not easy.

Lastly, as a reward for reading this far, let me offer you the funniest piece of journalism that I have ever read. Tim Cahill did not write it, but I never would have seen it without discovering him first. Sometimes, serendipity is a fine guide.

What’s it all about?

You’ve Got to Check This Out is a blog series about music, words, and all sorts of artistic matters. It started with an explanation. 208 more to go.

New additions to You’ve Got to Check This Out release regularly. Also, free humor, short works, and poetry post irregularly. Receive notifications on Facebook by friending or following Craig.

Images may be subject to copyright.

Author Notes: House of Prair, Den of Thieves

Read the notes! Buy the book!

As is apparent from comments that I have made elsewhere, I like private eye mysteries. When I sat down to write my first novel, the genre seemed like a natural for my initial venture into long form fiction. I had written for the theater, so the length was not off-putting. Otherwise, I had worked mainly in short stories and poetry. The advantage, I thought, to a private eye mystery was that I would be working in a form that gave me structure as well as a few tropes that I could rely upon as I found my way.

Unfortunately, I was the person who sat in the audience and wondered why the playwright couldn’t just have Hamlet go straight to his step-father and kill him. That would make for an interesting story, too. His mother might just accept that outcome. Polonius was never going to complain about much. Laertes might object, but only until Hamlet takes Ophelia’s hand and makes her queen. Of course, it would be utter crap as a psychological analysis and it really doesn’t sing as potential poetry.

So, instead, I started writing a mystery novel. Being me, I immediately tried to subvert all the usual private detective requirements. The archetype is not too far afield from a knight in shining armor. He has just enough wisdom to get out of trouble and the gumption necessary to find the trouble in the first place.

I created a “private detective”

who has quit the business. He has left the environment where he might have known his way around- maybe even pushed out of town by a dame. He has no office, leaving little hope of those classic scenes where Marlowe finds his next client waiting for him.

Author Notes House Prair Den Thieves

Then, there is always the question of whether or not the plot of the story would have happened with or without the actions of the protagonist. Chandler made Marlowe integral to the forward movement, but it is a question worth asking about a lot of detective mysteries.

Morgan Prair is more passive than most, though he is certainly not the first reluctant investigator. In the end, the villains of the piece only suffer because of Prair’s involvement. I do think the wrong man was going to be convicted of at least one murder without Morgan’s assistance.

More than cozy mysteries, private eye mysteries have often come out of a writer’s desire to comment on the world around them. By moving through their investigation, they uncover the shameful and the ignorant. I tried to honor that though I admit that I may have missed the mark. Twenty five years on, I might be even angrier about some of the issues I highlight.

The sequel, Prair for Mercy, goes more directly into issues of right and wrong. I hope you find this first book enjoyable enough to follow along.